Tennessee Restricts Use of Noncompete Agreements for Lower-Wage Employees

Tennessee employers should be aware of a new state law that limits the use of noncompete agreements for certain workers based on compensation level.
Under the new legislation, noncompete agreements are now prohibited for employees who earn less than $70,000 per year. This change reflects a broader national trend toward restricting post-employment restrictions for lower-wage workers and ensuring greater mobility in the labor market.
The law will apply to agreements entered into, renewed, or amended on or after July 1, 2026.
Noncompetes executed after July 1, 2026 for employees who do not meet the minimum annualized compensation will be void and unenforceable.
Noncompete agreements are generally used by employers to restrict former employees from working for competing organizations or starting competing businesses for a defined period of time after employment ends.
While these agreements remain permissible for higher-compensated employees under certain conditions, Tennessee’s new law narrows their enforceability by establishing a clear salary threshold.
For employers, this means that any existing noncompete agreements or onboarding templates should be reviewed to ensure compliance with the new requirement. Agreements that include noncompete provisions for employees earning below the $70,000 threshold may be unenforceable and could expose employers to legal challenges or compliance risk.
Employers should also consider whether alternative restrictive covenants—such as confidentiality agreements, nondisclosure provisions, and non-solicitation clauses—may be more appropriate and enforceable tools to protect business interests without violating state law. These alternatives are often less restrictive while still safeguarding proprietary information, customer relationships, and trade secrets.
Comparison of Common Employment Restrictive Covenants
Agreement Type | Primary Purpose | What It Restricts | When It Applies | Typical Duration | General Enforceability | Key Notes for Employers |
Noncompete Agreement | Prevent competition after employment ends | Working for a competitor or starting a competing business | Post-employment only | Typically 6–24 months (varies by state) | Highly regulated and increasingly restricted; some states ban or limit use based on salary or role | Must be narrowly tailored in scope, geography, and time; enforceability varies significantly by state |
Confidentiality Agreement | Protect sensitive business information | Disclosure or misuse of confidential or proprietary company information | During and after employment | Often indefinite for trade secrets | Strongly enforceable when reasonable and clearly defined | Should clearly define what constitutes “confidential information” to avoid ambiguity |
Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) | Prevent sharing proprietary information externally | Sharing company information with outside parties (competitors, public, third parties) | During employment and often after separation | Varies; often tied to duration of confidentiality obligations | Generally enforceable if reasonable | Frequently overlaps with confidentiality agreements; clarity is key to avoid duplication/confusion |
Non-Solicitation Clause | Protect workforce and customer relationships | Soliciting clients/customers or recruiting employees post-employment | Post-employment | Commonly 6–24 months | Moderately enforceable, but depends on state law and reasonableness | Often viewed more favorably than noncompetes; must be limited in scope and duration |
In addition, organizations should review job classifications, compensation structures, and standard employment agreements to confirm alignment with the new statutory requirements. Employers with multi-state operations should pay particular attention to differing state rules regarding noncompete enforceability, as thresholds and restrictions vary significantly across jurisdictions.
Clients with employees in Tennessee are encouraged to review current noncompete practices and consult with their HR team to ensure compliance with the new law and to identify alternative protections where appropriate.

